Skip to main content
Center for Community Engagement
About Ways to Engage Resources Toolkits
About
The Center Our Team What is community engagement?
Ways to Engage
Community-engaged scholarship Good Neighbor Day
Resources
Pathways Forward Resource Hub Summer Camps
Toolkits
Community-Engaged Research (CER) Toolkit Volunteering Toolkit
The Center Our Team What is community engagement?
Community-engaged scholarship Good Neighbor Day
Pathways Forward Resource Hub Summer Camps
Community-Engaged Research (CER) Toolkit Volunteering Toolkit
decorative

Evaluating CER for promotion and tenure

Home Digital Toolkits Community-Engaged Research (CER) Toolkit Evaluating CER for promotion and tenure

Community engaged research (CER) meets the same standards of rigor and scholarly excellence as traditional research. What distinguishes CER is the collaborative partnership with communities throughout the research process and the dual commitment to advancing knowledge and addressing real-world problems in specific community contexts.

Evaluating the quality of community engaged research requires attention to collaborative process, quality product, and meaningful impact.

In this section:


Key considerations for evaluating quality

  • Scholarly rigor: Clear research questions, appropriate methods, systematic inquiry, and contributions to knowledge that meet disciplinary standards
  • Partnership quality: Meaningful collaboration with community partners throughout the research process, demonstrating reciprocity, mutual respect, and shared authority
  • Community impact: Demonstrable benefits to community partners and broader publics, including but not limited to policy changes, practice improvements, capacity building, and addressing community-identified needs
  • Diverse scholarly products: Recognition that community engaged research may generate valuable outputs beyond traditional peer-reviewed articles, such as policy briefs, curricula, community reports, tools for practitioners, and public scholarship

Documentation and evidence examples

  • Traditional scholarly metrics (peer-reviewed publications, presentations, grants)
  • Letters from community partners describing the impact of the research and the quality of the collaborative partnership
  • Community-facing products and their documented use by stakeholders
  • Evidence of translation to practice or policy
  • Documentation of the participatory research processes employed

Understanding promotion and tenure expectations

Documenting community-engaged scholarship

  • Community-Engaged Scholarship Toolkit, Community-Campus Partnerships for Health
    • Toolkit that addresses how to document and present community-engaged work in ways that satisfy promotion and tenure requirements
    • Covers development of a vision, finding mentors, framing community-engaged work as rigorous scholarship, and building each component of a promotion portfolio
  • Tips for Constructing a Promotion and Tenure Dossier that Documents Engaged Scholarship Endeavors, Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement
    • Addresses how to document effectively in a promotion and tenure dossier
    • Includes how to distinguish between service, engagement, scholarship, and engaged scholarship
    • Outlines steps and lists best practices
  • Community-Engaged Scholarship Review, Promotion & Tenure Package, Community-Engaged Scholarship Review Peer Review Workgroup
    • Resource package developed to help (a) faculty seeking to document and present community-engaged scholarship (CES) work in a dossier and (b) Review, Promotion, and Tenure (RPT) committees in gaining a greater understanding of how the rigor and impact of CES can be documented

Publishing and building a scholarly record

Center for Community Engagement
0125 Main Admin Bldg, 7901 Regents Drive, College Park
thecenter@umd.edu 301-405-1113